F15e Vs F15ex - The US Air Force's request for F-15EX fighter jets to replace the aging F-15C/D Eagle has certainly been interesting. A number of lawmakers and retired generals saw the proposed purchase of 144 F-15EXs as a threat to the 80-year-old 1,763 F-35A program, driven largely by lobbying influence mixed with vested interests. They advocate that buying more F-35As, not F-15EXs, the solution is to replace the aging F-15C/D fleet, which has the inherent shortcomings of operating a 35-year-old fighter with an average of 8,300 flight hours. originally designed to fly only 4,000 hours. The message from this camp is that the F-15EX is an obsolete fighter from the 1960s, equipped with decades old technology, unsurvivable, ineffective, not of much value, not supporting the National Defense Strategy and more expensive. the only U.S. Air Force fighter currently in production is the F-35.
Brad Orgeron's latest article describes four possible combinations of procurement for three aircraft - the F-15C, F-15EX and F-35A - four options that will support the combat fleet for air superiority over the next 20 years. His research gave a much-needed objective and analytical voice to a conversation that had become highly subjective and emotional. Based on that, I hope to offer a different perspective, and he might not agree. Spoiler: The F-15EX and the F-35A are both needed, but not in the way the debate has been framed, and not necessarily in the way most defense pundits think. To understand this, one must start the conversation with strategy - many voices are ignored in the debate.
F15e Vs F15ex
Has become another buzzword to refer to in speeches, statements, interviews and congressional hearings. Although some form of "competition" is mentioned more than 60 times in the 2017 National Security Strategy and the 2018 National Defense Strategy, the Department of Defense still lacks a definition for combining words, thoughts, and actions.
F 15 Vs F 16 Vs F/a 18: The Aircrews' Perspective
That is, military leaders, strategists and planners have traditionally reflected the Western view of war in absolute terms - victory or defeat, and what kind of victory fails as deterrence. war or peace. People with this mindset may misinterpret strategic competition as an arms race, a gilded strategy that sufficiently deters the opponent and ensures quick victory if the deterrence fails. But it's not clear.
In the 1980s, the idea of competitive strategies became popular in corporate America, and the concept of strategic competition appeared in both the C-suite and the E-ring. In this context, the idea is described as a methodology to disrupt target markets in specific ways that intentionally cause competitive shifts. The goal is to deter competitors from specific geographic, technical, and ideological domains and push them toward parties that better serve U.S. interests in the long run. Like a business jockey for market share, competition is eternal and unending, not winning or losing, but ever-changing temporary states of winning and losing.
Generating a number of variables that can be mixed and matched to produce exponentially more skills that can be used to complicate the opponent's situation, giving commanders unique versatility. This should sound familiar to you as it is a marketing move for today's multi-domain operations.
The strategy implemented (the end) rarely matches the intended strategy (the beginning) because the strategy can and should evolve over time. Mintzberg's model recognizes that implemented strategy is actually a combination of both conscious and emergent strategies. As the strategy is implemented, several sub-strategies are combined and separated from the long-term target strategy as new opportunities arise.
India's Dynamatic Secures Workshare On F 15ex
What does this have to do with the F-15EX and F-35A? The F-35A represents the conscious part of the strategy, while the F-15EX represents the emergent part. The F-35A may be a generational basis for the Air Force's structural strategy in the 2070s, its use has little to do with the emerging scope of strategic competition traditionally envisioned (note that China and Russia are creeping in on their own) . . denial of weapon systems for 20 years). However, combining the F-35A with other operational force capabilities such as the F-15EX allows the Air Force to engage in strategic competition very effectively. So it is possible to stay committed to the F-35A and support the F-15EX at the same time. In other words, both sides are right.
How wrong both sides are. Just because the F-15EX has the ability to engage in strategic competition doesn't mean it will. Defense officials have said the fighter's purchase is based on a business case of logical cost-effectiveness, while Air Force officials have cautiously emphasized that the F-15EX is designed to complement and serve the F-35 across the spectrum of conflicts. as a backstop for capabilities and readiness for conventional F-15C/D missions. It's a predictable, boring business line. The new F-15EX, even with its impressive magazine of 12 air-to-air missiles, is no match for the traditional forward defense of forward defense bases and the strategic competition for protecting high-value airborne assets. . -35 To this end.
The litmus test for strategic competition is simple: Does the competitor care, and if so, why? Ultimately, if China or Russia don't care which platform Congress chooses to replace its aging F-15C/D fleet, the fighters shouldn't either. It will be a decision based on politics, emotion and social interest rather than strategy or national defense alone. However, this need not be the case. The F-15EX — now derided by F-35A backers and misunderstood by Air Force officials who buy it — is the strategic competition the Air Force desperately needs to be a disruptive force. has all the potential, albeit in a dramatically different way. than anyone has discussed.
This mindset requires that we first stop thinking about labels like "fighter" and "fourth generation" and look at the platform for its features and potential - the F-15 is not the plane you think it is.
Usaf Could Replace Its Fleet Of F 15e Fighter Bombers With F 15exs Expanding The New Program To Over 400 Aircraft
Originating as the US answer to the Soviet Union's Mach 3 MiG-25 interceptor, the Mach 2.5 F-15 is built around a large radar and designed to carry large long-range anti-aircraft missiles. In addition to its large size (20 percent larger than the F-35), it was designed before the advent of computers and digital wiring systems. This gives the F-15 a stable aviation design that current fighter jets lack. Most importantly, these features allowed him to develop. Today's F-15 is no more a Nixon-era fighter than the F-35 of the early 1990s.
Figure 1. Some of the dozens of configurations the F-15E has used in combat. During Operation Inherent Resolve, it carried anything from eight AIM-120s to seven 2,000-pound GBU-31 JDAMs. (Photo: author.)
The original light gray F-15C/D Eagle air superiority fighter, once hailed as a "no-pound air-to-ground" fighter, has evolved into the two-seat dark gray multirole F-15E Strike Eagle, which is the essential. Nearly every U.S. Air Force combat operation since 1991. The F-15E serves as the base model for the export versions of the F-15I, F-15K, F-15S, F-15SA, and F-15SG, and is an upgrade of the F-15SG 15EX. The size and improved structure of the F-15E trade the speed and maneuverability of conventional fighters for the best range, payload and sensor capability of any fighter in the US inventory. Not only can it use almost any weapon in the US and coalition inventory, but it's ridiculously versatile in terms of the combination of configurations it can fly with. These same attributes make the F-15 a workhorse for testing and deploying new weapons, sensors and emerging capabilities that will eventually evolve it into other fighter jets such as the F-22 and F-35.
Figure 2. On one side of the Boeing F-15E test site is an expanded wing station containing an AGM-88 high-speed jet missile, a Taurus KEPD 350 cruise missile, three GBU-54 laser JDAMs, eight small-diameter bombs - 2,000 units. lb GBU-31 JDAM on centerline and compliant fuel tanks. (Photo: Boeing/
The F 15ex Eagle Ii Is The Air Force's New Fighter
The modern F-15E shows how the careful division of fighter jets into "generations" can wrongly and unconsciously shape our perceptions. Consider the acclaimed sensor fusion of the fifth-generation F-35. This is made possible by computing power, software, sensors and algorithms; All things that have great potential for transferring to other platforms - and they have. Despite the hype, the truth is that almost all current fighters have had some form of sensor fusion for the better part of a decade. In fact, the newest, largest, and most capable radar and highest computing power in a US airliner isn't in a fifth-generation fighter—they're in the F-15E.
As I flew the F-15E, I watched it grow through seven major operational software upgrades (called suites) and several hardware upgrades, each more integrated than the last. When the next software update arrives, it will have even more sensors and hardware. In fact, the only limitation
F15e, f15ex fighter, ortofon f15e, dcs f15e, f15e eagle, f15e bases, f15e lakenheath, f15e model, f15e strike, f15e cockpit, revell f15e, f15ex fighter jet
0 Comments