alaska class cruiser

Alaska Class Cruiser - Cruisers were built at the end of World War II in response to the "cruiser arms race" that developed between the United States and Japan. When the ships were completed, the need for cruisers was no longer as urgent as before.

Cruisers played a key role in escorting and protecting transport ships. Their unique hybrid design allowed for a wide variety of tasks.

Alaska Class Cruiser

The ships of the Alaska cruiser class were different from the standard World War II cruisers. While these lightly armored and heavily armed ships were properly classified as cruisers, they were heavier and more powerful than previous US Navy cruisers.

Alaska Class Cruisers

Cruisers in response to the dire need for cruisers in the Pacific theater of World War II, but the design process was difficult. More than nine different designs were evaluated and only two of the six commissioned ships were completed. third construction

USS Guam and USS Alaska entered service in the last year of the war. However, their original mission was largely obsolete, as most of the Japanese heavy cruisers had already been defeated and the Navy now needed aircraft carriers more than cruisers. However, the speed of the Alaska class proved to be a huge advantage for the ships tasked with escorting the Navy's new fast aircraft carriers. USS Alaska escorted the carriers to conduct bombing raids on Tokyo and landing operations on Iwo Jima. He is charged with two murders. Along with USS Guam, USS Alaska was tasked with protecting the damaged aircraft carrier USS Franklin, which had to arrive in Guam for repairs.

Towards the end of the war, in 1945, USS Alaska participated in the coastal bombardment mission of Minami Daito Shima near Okinawa. Meanwhile, USS Guam was sent to East China and the Yellow Seas to engage in merchant raids. Two

The cruisers then regrouped to bombard the Okino Daito Shima island group. Both ships remained briefly in Asia after the war, but were decommissioned and eventually broken up in 1947. Like some other cruiser classes, they were too heavy to be economically converted into missile ships.

Detail Up Parts Set (without Wooden Deck) For Alaska Class Cruiser Cb 1 (for Hb) (plastic Model) Hi Res Image List

The cruisers became the heaviest of the cruisers of the last era of the war. Some effort was made to limit their weight, but these were still very powerful ships.

Cruise ships had over 100,000 pounds of asbestos insulation in their piping and machinery. Asbestos was also used in equipment such as pumps and valves, electrical equipment, brakes, HVAC systems, boilers, turbines, refrigeration equipment and more.

Veterans who served on Navy ships and worked in shipyards were exposed to asbestos. Navy insulators, laborers, pipefitters, electricians, boilermen and other maritime occupations have some of the highest rates of asbestos disease in the country. Many Navy veterans have been diagnosed with mesothelioma and lung cancer, which can be traced to the asbestos products used on some ships.

Belluck & Fox, LLP helps Navy veterans with mesothelioma by identifying where and how asbestos exposure occurs. We use evidence such as ship plans and colleague testimony to determine which asbestos products and which work activities on ships lead to greater asbestos exposure. We hold companies legally responsible that supply asbestos products and provide financial assistance to veterans and their families.

Uss Alaska Black And White Stock Photos & Images

Nationally recognized asbestos attorneys at Belluck & Fox, LLP have helped many Navy veterans. We can help you too. Learn how during our free case study.

It contains a wealth of information and resources to help you better understand the situation, choose (and afford) the right treatment, and exercise your legal right to compensation. The 9" (229 mm) belt has a 10 degree pitch (equivalent to 12" or 305 mm ) and a 5" (127 mm) taper.

SK air search radar 2 SG-1 surface search radar 2 Mark 8 fire control radar 2 Mark 12/22 fire control radar

The Alaskans were completed in 1944 as "large cruisers", sometimes described as a euphemism for battlecruisers. These were not true battlecruisers and Friedman discusses their design background in his volume on cruisers rather than in his book on battleships. Their role was to provide carrier escort, not reconnaissance for the fleet, and they lacked the underwater protection of true battlecruisers. The 4,720-ton armored guards accounted for 16.4% of their displacement. high for a heavy cruiser, but far less than 30% of a true battlecruiser like the British Hood.

The Uss Alaska Isn't As Cool As We Think It Is

The Alaskans formed the heavyweight group of the tri-tier cruiser family under a contract designed in 1939. With the outbreak of war, the other two tiers began construction as the Baltimore and Cleveland, whose designs were still affected by treaty limitations . It was inevitable that Alaska would be the biggest departure from the Treaty plans, as they fell into the displacement gap between the purpose-built Treaty warships and conventional cruisers. As a result, work on the Alaska design continued even as the foundations for the Baltimores and Clevelands were laid and planning for their successors (the postwar Des Moines and Worcesters) began.

The large cruiser concept was originally a response to German pocket battleships, which were considered "cruiser killers" capable of capturing and destroying conventional cruisers. There were also rumors that the Japanese had something similar in projects that the Japanese had originally designed but never built. The Alaskans became a favorite project of King, who was serving in the General Assembly, who saw them as ideal escorts for aircraft carriers conducting independent raids. The greatest threat to such raiding forces was thought to be enemy heavy cruisers. King was encouraged in this by Roosevelt, who was sometimes unfairly blamed for the Alaskans.

Alaska should be counted as one of the few design mistakes made by the US Navy during this period. It was a completely useless plan that did nothing an Iowa couldn't do better and did a lot of things much worse. and at $75 million each, they weren't much cheaper than the Iowas. Its specific disadvantages included terrible maneuverability, weak subdivision, the aforementioned inadequate torpedo protection, use of an exhaust intake, and weak anti-aircraft direction, which made effective anti-aircraft power little better than that of a heavy cruiser. Its only strong points were the neat main armament and the beautiful lines.

They Could Have Been So Much Better: While the basic concept was flawed, some of the preliminary designs could have at least resulted in a tidy mini-battleship like the French Dunkerques or a more balanced large cruiser. The grotesque final product was probably one where too many cooks messed up the water, as the design process seemed to have received unusual attention. The Navy apparently never really agreed on whether these would be true cruisers suitable for independent operations, carrier escort, or a fast battle line wing. The lack of consensus about their appropriate role has led to poor design choices such as mid-ship aircraft catapults, which are suitable for reconnaissance cruisers but not for escorting an aircraft carrier. Class Alaska, II. These were six very large cruisers ordered for the United States Navy before World War II. two were completed and entered service late in the war. The US Navy designation for ships of this class was "large cruiser" (CB) and most leading reference studies consider them as such. However, various other studies have alternately identified these ships as battlecruisers, although the US Navy never classified them as such. All Alaskas are listed as territories or insular territories of the United States, indicating their intermediate status between larger warships and smaller heavy and light cruisers.

Not Really A Cruiser, Not Really A Battleship, But Never A Battlecruiser: The Story Of The Us Navy's Alaska Class

The idea of ​​a large cruiser class arose in the early 1930s when the US Navy was trying to counter the Deutschland-class "pocket battleships" fielded by Germany. Design for ships that eventually became the Alaska class began in the late 1930s, after Germany developed Scharnhorst-class battleships and rumors that Japan was building a new class of large cruisers, the B-65 cruiser.

Following this treaty, the class was given large guns of a new and explosive design, limited protection against 12-inch shells, and engines capable of speeds of up to 1000 meters to serve as "cruiser killers" that could find and destroy heavy cruisers. 31–33 knots (57–61 km/h, 36–38 mph).

Of the six planned, USS Alaska and USS Guam were the only two completed. the third (USS Hawaii) was still under construction, its construction stopped on 16 April 1947 and the last three were cancelled. Alaska and Guam, WWII. During the last year of World War II, he served in the US Navy as a bomber and courier escort. They were decommissioned in 1947 after serving only 32 and 29 months respectively.

The development of heavy cruisers led to World War I and World War II due to the terms of the Washington Naval Treaty and successive treaties and conferences agreed to by the United States, Britain, Japan, France, and Italy to limit heavy cruisers to 10,000 tons. The displacement with the 8-inch main gun was formalized between World War II. Until the Alaska class, American cruisers designed between the wars followed this pattern.

Cruiser Photo Index Uss Alaska (cb 1)

Initial impetus for the design of Alaska

Portland class cruiser, alaska class large cruiser, bmx cruiser class, cleveland class cruiser, gozanti class cruiser, mogami class cruiser, cruiser class, venator class cruiser, carrack class light cruiser, imperial gozanti class cruiser, alaska class, alaska cruiser